Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockapedia
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 11:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rockapedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Allied45 (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:31, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia -related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 09:31, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Remagoxer (talk) 10:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:GNG as it lacks any real significant coverage outside of a self-published website and Facebook page. Omni Flames (talk) 11:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, concur with Omni Flames it fails WP:GNG, as it lacks significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Cannot find anything to indicate any notability. Aoziwe (talk) 10:06, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.